Secret Space UFOs - Rise of the TR3B (2021) Movie Script

Hey, what's up, guys?
Tyler here with Secure Team.
Something has been
discovered down on the moon.
So throughout history,
UFOs have been sighted
by astronauts,
astronomers and civilians
in outer space, ss well
as here on the ground.
What about all the sightings
that have occurred on land?
I think there has always been this
social stigma that's been attached
to people who have
been able to record UFOs
and actually believe in
what they have recorded
as something potentially
unnatural or not of this earth.
Tell me about the
first time you noticed
something strange in
the sky above Dunedoo.
Well, I came out here
in like 2012, in August
and pretty much the second
night that I was staying here.
I noticed a
strange ball of light
moving across the house in the
backyard, on the property behind us
and it was moving very
slow over the rooftops
and it was actually illuminating
the rooftops underneath it
as it was moving.
This thing is phenomenal.
It's just highly unusual.
And this was around
11:00 p.m. in the evening.
And, um, in this town here, there's
not many people are up at night.
There's not many street lights.
The town, um, it prides itself on
being the astronomy capital of Australia
because of the fact they have not
much light pollution like in the city.
So, yeah, the second night I
was here, I saw a very strange,
large, spherical ball, which
is half the size of the house
hovering above the
house, then heading north.
The direction north
was very unusual.
So, um, and it just
continued since then,
um, unabated, the sightings,
It's been a lot of
people have seen it now,
you know, people have come up here
and seen it from all around Australia
and, um, it's just getting
bigger and bigger in number.
Um, the actual eye
witnesses to what's going on.
How long do you think it's gonna take
till people accept these things are real?
How do you mean? Accept at
what level the population becomes,
when it becomes a
sociological... Sociologically, real?
I don't know.
When does it reach a level like
that to what happened in Australia?
That's what really scares me,
because what we're interested in
is technically not normal.
As Damien told you, he almost
attracted a psychiatric label
for filming what he's seeing,
so they're implying it was a
hallucination. But he's filming it.
To me, you're attracting a
decent case of medication
if you think I can
film my hallucination.
But a doctor can suggest
that with a straight face.
That to me is really scary.
Because this, this is aberrant.
I never believed that we're
on the fringe of society.
This is an outlier
belief system.
This is insane what
we're talking about.
But tell me what is sane?
Well sane is, being a
robot taking your brain out
and just going to
work and doing it
and never thinking
outside the box.
That's how they classify sanity.
Never, actually...
But none of us are running
around like headless chooks.
We're all holding down jobs
and mortgages and blah, blah.
So we're not completely nuts.
But our belief system is not nutty
enough that you look up into the sky
and Damien's made it
even more dangerous
because he's filming something
that's not supposed to exist.
While it's been widely discussed
that UFOs are of an alien nature,
we're starting to realize that many
of these may also be man-made.
What is
Secret Space theory, and what
are your findings on the topic?
When you talk about secret space
theories or secret space ideas,
you're really talking about two different
things here and they're both valuable.
They're both important.
But we're really talking about
conventional secret space operations
and unconventional
secret space operations.
So let's... The
conventional first
Look at it from a
military point of view
and that of, particularly, of
the United States military,
which looks at space as a
necessary Theater of Operation,
a necessary platform that
must be dominated by them.
If they're going to dominate
any theaters of operation
on the surface of Earth,
they must control space.
It's absolutely essential.
All those smart
bombs, smart missiles,
weapons systems that
are highly technological
rely on satellite information
being fed to them,
providing them
with all kinds of data,
maps and telemetry
information, and so forth.
And so, you must have
dominance in space
if you're gonna have dominance
on the surface of this planet.
Every military power on
this globe knows this fact.
I think it's important to have
serious historians like Richard Dolan,
who can really look into the UFO
phenomenon and the history behind it,
and we're going to look into
some of that history today,
The YB-49 nine was the first vector
shaped, jet-engine-equipped aircraft
to successfully fly
our airspace in 1947.
YB-49, a huge 100-ton dreadnought
packs 32,000 horsepower
in its eight jet engines.
At the controls
during the initial flight,
Our veteran test pilot, Max
Stanley, center, and a crew of two,
theirs is a big job.
And like a giant boomerang, the
mammoth craft picks up speed.
Trailing streams of
smoke from its jets,
Uncle Sam's latest
ace of the Atom Age
passes its test
with flying colors.
The YB-49.
It was a successor to the YB-35
which used propellers
to navigate the skies
and a precursor to
the B2 stealth bomber.
The Convair Kingfish
reconnaissance aircraft design
was the ultimate result
of a series of proposals
designed as a replacement
for the Lockheed U2.
The Kingfish competed
with the Lockheed A12
for the Project Oxcart mission
and lost to that design in 1959.
The Lockheed Have
Blue was the code name
for Lockheed's proof-of-concept
demonstrator for a stealth bomber.
Have Blue was designed by
Lockheed's Skunk Works division
and tested at
Groom Lake, Nevada.
The Have Blue was the
first fixed-wing aircraft
whose external shape was
defined by radar engineering
rather than by
aerospace engineering.
The aircraft's faceted shape was
designed to deflect electromagnetic waves
in directions other than that
of the originating radar emitter,
greatly reducing its
radar cross-section,
keeping it secret in space,
a precursor design to the F-117.
Over the years, as the United States'
technological progress advanced
so, too, did their
military arsenal.
This arsenal has been tested in the
field of battle, like the Vietnam War,
and, of course,
in the Middle East,
from the 80s up until recently.
The skies over Baghdad
have been illuminated.
Not every citizen of
the public is exposed
to the modernization
of our military craft.
But there are those who
have worked inside our military
who have watched firsthand
the development of incredible secret
aerospace technologies evolve over time.
One such individual who has first-hand
witnessed the feats of our own technology
is a man by the
name of Jim Goodall,
former Air Force man,
spooky airplane researcher
and friend of former director of
Lockheed Skunk Works Ben Rich.
Jim is an extremely
experienced individual
when it comes to the hidden
history of secret aircraft.
He blew the lid on Area
51, and as a photographer,
he's uncovered the
hidden history of test aircraft
before they were
public knowledge.
This is the shape of the F-117.
It's an arrowhead.
Well, if it's being
lit up for whatever,
and this was given to
me by F-117 crew chief.
This is the actual RAM, Radar
Absorbant Material, used on the F-117.
I said, "Can I go
to jail for that?"
They said, "No, no, the
technology has changed so much."
This is 40 years old.
It's old technology,
And that's the other thing
you got to take in consideration
when you see programs
that are being declassified
or talked about.
We're talking about
stuff that may have flown
and program came to an end,
all the tooling destroyed
20 or 30 years ago,
and we're just finding
out about it today.
I'm a historian. That's
probably why I do what I do.
I'm a historian, I'm an Aviation
historian. I'm a military historian.
And I figure, as an
American taxpayer,
you're spending my money on our
defense, which is the proper thing to do.
But I should have...
But if I ask a question of my
government, I expect an honest answer.
I don't expect to
get a run around.
If it's not classified
or if the part I'm asking
about is not classified,
then damn it, I expect an
answer. I don't expect a runaround.
I worked on the A-12
early in the program,
which is the
predecessor to the SR-71.
It's the single-place
CIA-funded-and-operated Blackbird.
They were flight-tested
and based out of Area 51,
but they were operationally...
They flew out of Kadena
Air Base, Okinawa.
That's the same place
the SR-71s operated
after the A-12s were
replaced by the SR.
I worked in the assets,
but primarily telemetry.
So that's the primary
reason I was at Edwards,
and one of the reasons
I flew into Area 51
is to install some additional
telemetry equipment.
The stuff I was working
on wasn't classified.
The programs that
we're monitoring were.
There would be flight
testing for the XB-70
the C-141 Starlifter and,
of course, the Blackbird.
And on May 30, 1967, Mele
Vojvodich flew the first A-12
from Area 51
air-refueled twice, and flew
from Area 51 in central Nevada
to Kadena, Okinawa, in
5 hours and 29 minutes.
If you're going to take a
commercial airliner today,
it'll take you 17 or 18
hours for that same flight.
Uh, Mele was the first guy
to fly an operational mission,
and that was on May 30, 1967.
When was the last flight?
The last flight was
on the June 21, 1968,
and it wasn't until the
fall or early winter of 1988,
20 years after it was retired,
that they admitted
to the existence
of the single-place CIA
version of the Blackbird
referred to as the A-12.
So if we go back to the
early history of aeronautics
and we look at some of the craft
that have been created and built
by the military-industrial
contractors over the years,
many of them have taken
on the shape of a boomerang,
a V, or dare I say, a triangle.
You're going to have a
militarization of space,
and you're absolutely
going to have
a kind of natural escalation of
weapons, like an arms race in space.
And that's going to require
a significant classified
component of that militarized space.
And so that's, that is a
secret space program.
And there is no argument
against this whatsoever.
Like everyone knows
that this is the case.
We got the NRO, the National
Reconnaissance Office,
for example, which has
been operational since 1960,
and they have had a
significant, uh, presence in space.
It's almost completely...
Not almost, is
completely classified.
We have essentially zero,
uh, real, tangible information
about what the NRO is doing,
or the most bare-bones
stuff, that's all.
And, you know, you've got the Navy,
the Air Force, all of which, both of which
have classified space elements,
and now with a unified space force
that's all going to
be reorganized and...
But you're gonna have massive,
classified components to all of this.
So that's a conventional way
to look at a secret
space program.
And that will
incorporate, uh, you know,
probably some very interesting
technology in the satellites
in terms of optics,
maybe in terms of even
their ability to maintain
orbit for long periods of time.
Uh, you know, I mean,
you've got the X-37B
which is kind of a militarized
version of the space shuttle,
and all of those missions
are highly classified.
We know a little bit about what
the X-37B does, is capable of,
but we don't really know
what the missions are.
We're not really
informed of that.
So there's a lot of elements
of a secret space program
that are no great
shakes, at least from...
They're not going to
transform our world view.
But then there's the other
element of the secret space program
that people often really
want to know about it,
which involves, let
us say, unconventional
and unacknowledged
activities and science
that are not supposed to exist.
And that involved what we
would call the UFOs, all right.
So that's where it gets a
little more interesting, perhaps.
A dear friend just passed away.
He is a retired SR-71
pilot named Dave Fruehauf.
And Dave retired as
a Lieutenant-Colonel.
I'm talking with Dave and I said,
"Dave, you believe in UFOs?"
He said, "Absolutely,
positively, they do exist."
He said. "I was flying a night
training mission in an SR-71"
"out of Kadena, Okinawa."
"I was in the far
Western Pacific."
"We're at 78,000
feet, 77,000 feet,"
"at Mach 2.7."
"We're going straight."
It's 11 o'clock at night
"and we're sort of heading
our way back towards Kadena."
"It was a three-quarter
moon, and all of a sudden,"
uh, Dave said he got a
glint of something metallic
five or six miles
off to his right
and maybe 4,000 or
5,000 feet above him.
So he contacts Kadena
on secure voice, said,
"Do we have another bird up?"
They said, "You'd know if we
did, you were at the briefing.
"No, you're the
only one up there."
He said "No, I'm not. I'm
gonna go take a closer look."
His back-seater said. "Hey,
Dave, we have company."
He said, "Yeah, I'm
gonna see who it is."
So he moved, pushed,
the advances, the throttles
about a ten-degree
bank and he's climbing,
and he's heading
towards this object.
He's still getting
glints off of the edges.
It's not circular shaped.
It has sharp edges,
and he's getting glints, and
it's metallic, or it's shining.
He figured when he was about a
mile or two away from this object,
and it's still a couple of
thousand feet below it,
it accelerated at about a
30-degree angle of attack
and left him in the dust.
About 85,000 feet
to 180,000 feet.
I mean, boom.
I mean, it was like he was
heading in the opposite direction,
He figured it's going at least
8,000-10,000 miles an hour.
In 1978,
cosmonaut Pavel Popovich claimed
he saw a sparkling white object
in the shape of an
equilateral triangle
flying at about 10,000
meters above Earth.
I think it's amazing
the way that NASA
and other aeronautics industries
have been able to hide this
strange alien or UFO phenomenon
from the general
public for so many years.
And on that side of it,
what I would say is that,
you know, we don't have...
We don't have firm,
authenticated proof.
We don't have an admission from
the government, from the military
from any of those
people, that says,
"Yes, there are UFOs out there"
or, "We have constructed a
element of our space program"
"to deal with UFOs
that are out there."
However, what we
can say is that there are
enough pieces of testimony
and evidence and anomalies
that have been
recorded in Earth orbit,
that, or beyond, frankly,
that strongly indicate
to a rational observer,
that's something really
odd is going on out there.
That is not supposed
to be happening
by any standard of understanding
or science that we have.
So that's, that's where
you start getting into.
Is there a secret space program that is
connected with the UFO phenomenon?
And I personally think that the
answer to that is there absolutely is.
And the real question is...
How far does it go? What are
the real contours and parameters
of this presumably very secret,
classified space program?
And that's where, you know... I
don't know anyone who actually knows
the full dimensions
of how far it goes.
In other words, do
we have black triangles
that can go beyond Earth
orbit to a nearby planet
or the moon or
something like that?
I mean, there are people
who make this claim.
Or do we have
replicated alien tech?
Um, in terms of, you know,
like, the legendary ARV.
The Alien Reproduction Vehicle.
Did we actually make
that? And does that go?
Has that gone throughout
the solar system?
We don't, we don't have
proof of these things,
but we have our stories.
Some of them are
pretty darn interesting,
and some of them
are maybe believable
to those of us who
have looked into it.
But we're in an area of what I would
say, making informed speculation
based on genuine
knowledge that we have.
But we don't have
the full picture.
So we get some information
and at least at this point
makes some inferences,
and maybe put together
some interesting hypotheses
about what's going on.
As you watch, notice
all of the different signs
of triangle or
TR-3B like objects
in all of the mission
patches and NASA imagery.
This is NASA's official seal,
which was also designed
back in the late 1950s at the
same time as the meatball insignia.
German Aerospace... Turkey...
Are you starting
to see the pattern?
The official patch for
Russia's old space station.
This is the official insignia for NASA's
famed Apollo lunar landing program.
For example, the official insignia of
NASA's STS space shuttle program
is comprised of more than one
representation of subtle vector symbology.
Notice the strange and
mysterious vector-shaped UFO
reflected in the
astronaut's visor.
We leave you
much that is undone.
There are great
ideas undiscovered.
Breakthroughs available
to those who can remove
one of truths protective layers.
My name is Alara.
Um, I kind of woke
up to the ET presence
and I would say, got
activated in late 2017
when I had a close
encounter with a spacecraft
that was about fifty feet in front of
me, that de-cloaked in front of me.
After that happened to me, I started going
to UFO events and conferences and so forth,
trying to seek out
other experiencers
and begin to get some
understanding of what happened to me
and what the truth
was about this planet,
what was going on here.
So in 2019,
I went to Contact in the Desert
in Indian Wells, California,
and when I was a that event,
I decided to go to the CE-5.
I think it was on
a Friday night.
I went to that CE-5 event, and a lot of
kind of unusual things happened that night
that I was not
expecting to happen.
During that CE-5 event.
I did see a couple of ships phase
in and phase out in the distance.
Uh, lots of, like,
activity like that.
But what was very interesting
was that there was a very heavy
military presence there
throughout the entire evening.
And I kind of was
puzzled as to why.
Because I didn't
see that much activity
to justify that kind
of military presence.
There was one
really unusual event
that happened that night
while I was at that CE-5.
There was these two...
There was these two, I
don't how to describe them,
except they looked like
butterflies that were on fire.
They were very unusual.
And I've never seen or
experienced anything like this.
They sort of phased in and
phased out probably three times.
And when they phased in, they
would dance, and they were kind of...
They had the whole crowd in
awe, and the crowd was just tripping
on these butterfly UFOs.
And they were dancing and
then they would phase out,
anyway, it was a pretty
intense experience.
And at one point, I kind of felt a lot
of different energies over that field.
I sensed what I believe were
cloaked ships above that field.
But I didn't... Of course, I
didn't see anything like that,
so I ended up leaving the event.
I think it was around 11
o'clock at night. I left by myself.
Got my car. Was
staying at a hotel
about two miles away that night.
When I was driving to the hotel,
I notice this really bright white
light in the rear-view mirror,
so I was about a mile away
from the hotel at the time,
I drove to the
hotel parking lot,
I parked my car and
I got out my phone
and I started taping
this white light.
And it was a ship, and it
was sitting above that field,
at the CE5 that I just left where
there was nothing going on.
I remember thinking, "I
wonder if anybody at the field"
"can see what I'm
taping right now."
Because it was really bright
and it was very significant.
So I was taping that
for about 30-35 minutes.
It was there for quite a while,
just sitting above that field,
And at a point, I ended
up going back into my room
and playing the footage back.
When I played the footage back,
I noticed there was a TR-3B
be sitting there cloaked, above that
ship, above the field the entire time.
Uh, and that kind of
blew my mind actually.
Uh, what I thought was
really significant about that
was, number one, that
my phone picked this up,
but I didn't see it
with my naked eye.
I thought that was interesting.
I also thought it was interesting
that here, if you really
look closely at the footage,
it looks like there's
more than one,
although one stands out
far more than the other.
So, um, I thought it
was significant also
that there was a TR-3B craft,
whether there was one or two
sitting above the
field of a CE-5 event
at a major UFO conference.
I thought, that's kind of spoke
volumes about what's going on here.
And so, if you ask
me, I think that there...
I think that we've back
engineered alien technology.
I think our secret
space programs
have really super-advanced
stuff that they back engineered,
and I think they're hiding
it from the population.
And I think they're
able to do this
because all of these craft
can cloak to our naked eye.
Also, it occurred to me later
that those two butterfly UFO's
that were on fire,
that perhaps those...
That I was right about
my intuitive hit on those
and maybe those
were a projection
coming from one of those
cloaked ships above the field.
Here we have a clip
from a man named Eric
that was filmed on
September 7, 2021,
of an obvious triangular
TR-3B shaped object
with three distinct
lights on each corner.
He says that it was captured
in northwest Pennsylvania.
He said that the object
looked longer than others
and was very low, and
has a very low, deep tone
that is obvious when
the object was going over,
because of how different
it was and sounded,
compared to other aircraft.
What is that?
Here, we have an almost identical
object to the clip that you just saw
with white glowing
lights on each corner,
forming a triangle that
seems to be moving
steadily and silently
as it passes above
and finally fades
off into the darkness.
The man who recorded this, Joe
Wall, from New Hampshire said,
"I made a little compilation
where the original video plays first,"
"then with it zoomed
in and slowed."
"I thought it was
pretty insane."
"That whole town kept losing
power that night as well."
"It would go off and back on."
"Couldn't even use my
debit card at the gas station."
"I stayed at a
hotel right there."
Here's a clip from a
man named Mark Kline
that was filmed above his home,
where he was doing some sky
watching and filming in infrared
recording the stars, and
seeing what he could capture.
At first, we see a satellite
as indicated in the video,
and then, as indicated
with the arrow,
We then see a distinct
triangular pattern of lights,
this time emitting
more of a blue tinge
but nonetheless flying in a
perfect triangular formation.
Silently passing overhead
with the trees in the foreground.
And some of you may be asking,
"Well, why is it that if these are
"solid triangular craft, are we able to
sometimes see stars through them?"
One of the main theories
regarding some of the technology
used within these vehicles
is a cloaking ability
that essentially puts
a mirrored image
around the object
of everything that
is surrounding it,
hence giving you a view as if you
are looking straight through the object.
In this amazing clip,
we have another object
that is extremely similar
to one of the earlier clips
we showed of another one of
these triangular formations of lights
moving in a perfect
synchronized fashion,
as if the lights are
locked in with one another.
The man who captured
this, Michael Serrata, said,
"I captured footage of a
huge triangle formation
"or possibly a single
object, two months ago.
"I have since filmed other
triangular UFOs similar to this object,
but are different
triangle-shaped formations.
And as the clip starts,
we see a few objects
moving through space, and we
can see laser pointers being used
to attract the attention of whatever
these unknown objects are.
And so, as they were focusing
their laser pointer on the one object
towards the center
of the screen,
they completely
miss what comes next.
What appears to be nearly
identical to the earlier clip
where we have, this time,
three fiery red glowing lights
to the right of the screen,
moving upwards to the northwest,
where you can almost make out the the
angle of the way the object is being viewed
by the distance and
the way the lights look,
from the brightest light
being closest to the camera
and the furthest
and smallest light,
a little more hard to
see in the background,
as if the object is tilted.
Here, you're seeing
an enhanced version
of the formation
of fiery red lights
that once again could be a
formation, or could simply be
a solid craft using some
sort of cloaking technology.
Here is a recent clip taken above
Shanghai, China, in June of 2021,
where bystanders on the
ground were shocked to see
this solid, sharp-edged
black triangle
sitting silently in the sky, moving
slowly through the clouds of Shanghai.
Got a weird, little thing.
Looks like another
stingray-type thing.
Here, we have what the viewer
called a stingray-like triangle object.
It was captured in the skies
over England on August 16, 2021.
In 2004, the United States Navy
applied for a patent to
produce a triangular craft
that looks a lot like the TR-3B,
and its propulsion system could
be something completely different
than what the original TR-3B
supposedly operated on.
My name is Edgar
Rothschild Fouche.
I'm here to speak about
secret government technology,
reverse engineering
of alien artifacts
and the Top Secret
MJ-12 committee,
Before I'm through,
you'll know exactly
what the flying triangle is,
the one that's been
sighted around the world.
It's the most exotic and
classified aerospace vehicle
that's ever been built.
And may be stealthily hovering
over Phoenix, Belgium, or your city.
The company in question
was involved in developing
the TR-3B gravity
disruption device
called a magnetic
field disruptor,
which is the circular
accelerator, part of the TR-3B,
which I'll go into
more detail in a minute.
So I'd first learned about
Ed Fouche back in 2004,
while I was just doing some
research on anti-gravity,
and I found an old presentation
called 'the case for anti-gravity'
and, uh, right
towards the end of that,
they had mentioned Ed Fouche
and quasi-crystals
and meta-materials, um,
which I started looking into.
Found, you know, Ed Fouche's,
you know, original presentations
from IUFOC in 1998.
This idea of rotating
mercury plasma engine.
And so I started making a couple
of videos on the physics ideas
behind this anti-gravity,
mercury-spinning, mercury-centrifuge engine
and that whole gem theory thing.
And that caught the attention of
someone who knew Ed Fouche,
a guy named Ella McCoy,
who had a YouTube
channel on back in the day.
But he put me in
touch with Ed Fouche.
The rest of this video,
although not complete,
is a list of man-made
advanced propulsion,
or as those of us in the know like to
call them, Alien Reproduction Vehicles.
I'm going to go over a few
known examples of these,
and how to differentiate between
them and actual alien vehicles,
those produced and flown
by extraterrestrial entities.
The first on our list is
the TR-3B Flying Triangle,
which is the craft we see in
the first ever episode of X-Files.
This craft was the
first ever prototype ARV
to use the superfluid
antigravity centrifuge engine.
It looks like they
built the engine first
and then came up
with the aircraft design
to build around
it, to make it fly.
If you notice,
the fluid is rotated
inside of a small
semi-spherical container
located at the
center of the craft.
Since theTR-3B
uses an accelerator
with a small radius,
it only succeeds in eliminating
85% of the total weight of the craft.
Thus the rest of the lift is provided by three
thrusters at each corner of the triangle,
similar to the PV-704's use in
the Avrocar propulsion drive.
Only these run on
liquid oxy-hydrogen.
These served to stabilize
and control the flight of the craft
as well as a
portion of the lift.
Stabilization and direction
is a key design problem
with craft that utilize a superfluid,
super-ferro fluid in the gravity engine.
Note the three stabilizer units mounted
on the underside of these other craft.
These air most likely some
sort of specialized gyroscopes.
But they also could be some sort of
wave amplifiers as Bob Lazar suggests.
Either way, their function is more or
less the same, stabilization and direction.
You can tell by the fact
that there are three of them.
It appears that they also
double as tripod landing gear.
Brad Sorenson produced this drawing
of an ARV or Alien Reproduction Vehicle.
Here are some other
photographs of similar craft
which, in my opinion, are all man-made
products of the secret government.
To me, the most fascinating
vehicle from the Aurora program
has been the TR-3B.
It's a triangular-shaped vehicle
that uses a circular accelerator,
if you imagine a
circle within a triangle,
that rotates a
mercury-based plasma
at 60,000 revolutions
per minute,
pressurized at
250,000 atmospheres
and super-cooled to
150 degrees Kelvin.
I absolutely that all the
triangular-shaped vehicles
that have been spotted
belong to the US Government.
He does come from a background
of, you know, Intelligence.
And he did teach me a lot
about, you know, about how the
intelligence works in the military,
and how these special access
programs, and how all the funding
and the contracting and
all that stuff really works.
He did teach me
an incredible amount
about, you know, how that stuff
really functions behind the scenes,
but it also helped me, you know,
verify a lot of what he was saying.
First off, we asked TD Barnes if
Bob Lazar ever worked out of Area 51
and his answer was
straight out, "No."
He was former special
projects manager out at Area 51
for almost a decade
When I asked him if Ed Fouche,
if he could, you know, ask around
and tell me if Ed Fouche worked
out there, his response back was,
"I can neither confirm nor deny whether
Ed Fouche worked out of Area 51".
And that kind of, you know, confirmed it
for me, you know, when TD Barnes said
he can't confirm nor deny
whether Ed worked out there.
That was like, "Well, that
means he worked out there,"
What was it about
his explanation
of the physics of
the supposed TR-3B
that piqued your interest
and made you think, "Hmm,
maybe there's something here."
The thing that
interested me first was
that there was a couple
different sources talking
about this rotating, you
know, rotating superconductors,
research was just coming out.
A lot of that research was
being done at NASA at the time,
and was coming out through American
anti-gravity around the same time.
So we're learning about NASA's
research with rotating super conductors,
the Russian Podkletnov and his
rotating superconductor experiment.
And so I I thought that there might
be some sort of connection between,
you know, rotating
superconductor anti-gravity research
and this idea of a rotating
mercury-based plasma.
And so I began investigating
that connection first.
That's what drew me, initially, to the
the propulsion technology side of it.
But then, the mention of
quasicrystals and meta-materials
and all that interesting
scientific literature I started finding
when I began
researching those topics
made me instantly realize
that, you know, this was,
you know, meta-materials are
used for invisibility technology
and that then I started
realizing you know, realizing
all the technology that, you know, all the
research that has been done on Area 51,
Project Rainbow
and all this other stuff,
and I was able to confirm that a
lot of those, uh, these materials
were, in fact, you
know, something special,
and that, you know, some ordinary
staff sergeant from the military
knowing about these
things, there was something,
you know, maybe
something more there.
'Cause it wasn't something that your
average person talked about in 1998.
No, it was virtually
unheard of, in fact.
A lot of that
physics literature,
you can't find a lot
of meta-materials.
You can't find a lot
of stuff in the literature
on meta-materials or
quasicrystals before, in 2002.
And then Fouche was talking
about these things in 1998
nearly four years earlier.
So that sort of, you
know, really made me say,
"Wow, this is something you
should be paying attention to"
"and looking deeper into."
When I started researching
quasicrystals, you know,
I realized that the guy who discovered
quasicrystals, Dan Shechtman,
did his Post-Doc after
receiving his materials degree
in Material Science from
Technion University in Israel,
he went and did his Post
Doc at Wright Patterson
at the Wright State
Materiels Command,
which is the exact place
where, you know, you'd expect
these sort of alien
materials to be, you know,
to be present and
being analyzed.
So I thought that was a
very interesting connection
that the scientist who
discovered quasicrystals
did some work connected to
Wright Patterson Materiel Command
on icosahedral phase
crystals and stuff.
So It was quite interesting
to learn about that.
Then, of course, if you research
all the history of metamaterials,
you'll find that these were
developed pretty much at Area 51,
was a lot of the pioneering
research into meta-materials
and nuclear magnetic
resonance and EMF response.
Those technologies
were pioneered at Area 51.
Again meta-material
is an interesting word.
It's basically...
Meta-material, for the layman,
is a material that gains its
resonant or response properties
through its structure.
Not through its composition
or what it's made of,
but by just the natural
structuring of the actual material.
So it was discovered that grids, for
example, had a different response,
or, um, the things with sharp
edges had a different response
than smooth edges
and rounded edges,
which is why you see all those
sharp edges on the F-117 stealth fighter
versus you know, the round edges
on the fuselage than
the quasicrystals,
because that was
some deep insight
into some interesting
and how he knew about that
and how he was aware
of those technologies...
Um, you know, I'm still
trying to figure that out,
and I, you know, I think it might have
been... He might've knew Harold Puthoff
and might have gotten the
information through Harold Puthoff.
There was one contact I know that he
had because he talked about Hal Puthoff
and actually had his email and
put me in touch with Hal Puthoff
years ago at one point,
So I know that he had
some of these contacts
who are into this black
world physics stuff.
So a quasicrystal is
is a periodic crystal.
It has a different phase.
It has recurring symmetries,
but it doesn't have
innate symmetry
at the basic level.
It has a more complex
symmetry shape.
So they were originally
thought not to exist.
In fact, one of the most
famous scientists of the day,
Linus Pauling, you know,
once famously claimed
there's no such thing as
quasicrystals, only quasi-scientists,
making a, you know, a direct
jab at Daniel Shechtman,
who is, of course, the scientist
that made this discovery
and won the Nobel Prize for
the discovery of quasicrystals,
Also, quasicrystals have
very amazing optical properties,
which is one of the main
things that I took note of
and started researching when
I first found out about them.
For instance, a researcher from
Princeton, New Jersey, Eric Quinones
showed that you could
bend fiber optic signals
at 90-degree angles
without losing signal quality.
So basically, you can basi...
You can build photonic computers
out of quasicrystals and meta-materials
and build wave-guides that
would use light in photonics,
in a type of advanced circuitry.
So that was what I first saw
and started learning about
when I first researched
these things back in 2004
and I immediately, you
know, realized that, you know,
we're dealing with something
very close to alien technology.
What I believe alien technology
would look like, you know,
describe, as we think of it,
engineered down to the atomic level,
A rotating, pulsating
red light in the middle.
We also talk about an object,
that had vertical development,
Those who could see it from the
side, saw a dome, dome on the top of it,
And in these domes,
there are windows.
My opinion, uh, it didn't
have any influence at all
on all the witness reports,
which were done before.
So it has no influence, in
fact, on the Belgian wave.
But it's very unfortunate that
we have shown this photograph
as being the brand
of the Belgian wave
of being the object that has
been operating above Belgium.
So what kind of aircraft were
being developed in the late 1980s
that could explain that
Belgian wave of UFO sightings?
Because I've had a number of people
that have watched my videos on the TR-3B
and came and said,
"Listen, I had a sighting."
"I saw this craft, and there's
nothing else that looks like it"
"except this TR-3B thing
that you're talking about."
"Nothing else that can
describe accurately what I saw."
So there is a lot of research
that's being done in ufology,
into what kind of craft were
being developed during that time.
Could they explain
this, or was it, you know,
a wave of visitors from outer
space that were responsible?
Um, you know, what
are the origins of that craft
that people were
seeing in those sightings?
So we did look back to, you
know, Northrop-Grumman
and that 1991 Popular
Mechanics article on the TR-3A,
because we have aTR-3A. It's a real...
Apparently there's blueprints on it.
There's a whole, there's a
contractor, Northrop Grumman,
that developed a TR-3A.
So that led us to thinking,
"Oh, well, TR-3B has got to be
another Northrop Grumman craft"
because, you know,
it's just one letter off.
But then I talked to Ed
Fouche, and he said,
no, he didn't think that Northrop
Grumman was the contractor,
that they had used the TR-3A
and change the letter to
make it, you know, similar,
so that it would
throw people off.
You know, another layer here
of secrecy, to throw people off.
So it's hard to say, we have
never found, you know, blueprints
or, you know, a contractor
or anyone come forward
that said they've worked on
these massive space platforms.
Apparently these
platforms were developed
for a secret space program,
specifically, as you know,
transport vehicles to shuttle,
you know, men and
cargo to and from space
to secret space
platforms and locations.
Of course, you know,
again, the evidence for this is
- is where we we, um...
- We're lacking.
We're lacking a definitive
proof to show that, you know,
this is what's really going on.
But these are some of the stories
that, you know, have come out of this.
Typically, aircraft
lettering is,
you know, the letter stands
for what its purpose is.
Like, F is for
fighter, B is bomber,
So TR, Tactical Reconnaissance
would follow that, you know, nomenclature,
Certainly, but again, this
is where Ed Fouche says
that we step outside the normal
zone into the Twilight Zone.
Things are a little
different in the black world.
But again, this speculation
is just speculation
because we don't have
military classifications.
We have some... we know that,
you know, physicists were working
on nuclear-powered
aircraft as early as the 1960s.
In fact, Stan Friedman
apparently worked on
on some of these
nuclear-powered aircraft as well.
You know, famous UFO
researcher Stanton Friedman,
which I thought was interesting.
And I sent you that info on that
other nuclear-powered aircraft
that they were thinking about and
conceptualizing back in the '70s.
But of course, treaties outlawed
the use of nuclear weapons
in space and on airplanes.
So, um, you know, if research
continued with nuclear powered aircraft,
they would have had to be
done in a complete black world
where, well, it would never,
you know, see the light of day
because that of course would
violate international treaties.
And, you know, the TR-3B
is basically like an illegal craft,
and if it does exist,
or ever did exist,
then chances of it being
declassified are almost zero
because it isn't,
because it violates
you know, international
treaties for nukes and airplanes.
So it's kind of like
this dilemma craft
It's not like the SR-71
or the A-12 or the F-117,
where, you know, after a
couple of years of being out there,
it's going to turn
from a, you know,
black world craft to, you know,
where they have to
admit to it and show it off.
I don't think we're
ever gonna get that day
where they roll one of these
TR-3Bs out of the hangar
and show it off to the public. I don't
think that that would ever happen
even if it were the case.
The person who founded and
created the Lockheed Skunk works
was Kelly Johnson.
His right-hand man
was Ben R. Rich.
Ben was an aeronautical
engineer. he was a thermodynamist.
He's... I think he was
originally from England.
Think I met him at a conference
and talked to him and asked
him, "You know, could I call you?"
And he was, you know,
he was very obliging,
And we just started
up a conversation.
And it grew to the
point over 25 years,
that we spoke
approximately once a quarter.
If I didn't call
him, he called me.
According to Ben Rich,
we have the ability today
to take ET home.
Which means we have the
hardware. We're flying the stuff.
It's very possible some
of the UFOs that are seen
are man-made.
Now, John Andrews
in June of '86,
John Andrews was
with Testor Corporation.
They make model
airplanes and cars and stuff,
And he was a pen-pal with Ben.
Ben adored John
Andrews and he adored me
because we had a passion
for what he had a passion for.
And John wrote a
letter to Ben Rich,
and he said, "Ben, I have
to ask you a question."
"Do you believe in UFOs?"
Now, there are two categories.
Both man-made
and extraterrestrial.
And Ben came back
on his own letterhead
as president of the
Lockheed Skunk Works.
He said, "Both Kelly and I are
firm believers in both categories."
"We refer to ours as
Un-Funded Opportunities"
and he underlines
the U, the F and the O.
He said, "But beware,
there are people"
"who will lead you astray
and possibly do you harm."
Ben told us that "we refer to
ours as unfunded opportunities."
If you didn't fund it, if you
didn't have to pay for it,
if it was given to you, or it
crashed and you recovered it,
that's an unfunded opportunity.
And in 1996, it was
a graduate student
gathering or convention of
aeronautical engineers from UCLA.
And their keynote
speaker was Ben Rich,
and Ben had been retired
as President of Skunk Works.
And he's out there
talking about what he did
for the 40 years, you know,
he worked with Kelly Johnson.
And one of the
last things he said.
And you can search it on
Google or Bing or whatever,
it's, it's there.
Ben Rich told this
audience in 1996,
"We have the ability
to take ET home"
But the government won't
declassify the information.
When Ben Rich was
referring to the fact
that we had the
ability to take ET home,
that means we can
travel across the universe.
I believe he said it because we
have recovered crashed UFOs.
We have been given UFOs,
and we have found
abandoned UFOs.
Now one question has
been raised repeatedly
when you talk about
issues about disclosure,
all right, UFO disclosure.
And there's a very
significant argument
that the admission of
something else out there
can easily be used,
let's say, by the military
to justify, you know,
further ballooning
of the already
massive military budget.
We hear this a lot,
and some people will talk about
this in a totally pejorative way.
They'll say, "Well, they're creating
an alien threat where there isn't one"
"just to scare the public and justify
all this extra money being spent"
"to either take
your rights away"
"or to just spend a lot
of money on military."
There's another
way to look at it,
which is that they
might play it that way
because there is
a genuine threat.
Like, a lot of the
folks who complain
about the possibility
of, like a false flag
or some kind of deception
about an alien threat,
they're working
off the assumption
that the aliens are definitely
not afraid, or definitely beneficial.
And, you know,
where I stand on that is,
I think that's never been
a rock-solid assumption.
There are people
who believe that.
I've just never
been fully persuaded
by the evidence
that that's true.
My opinion is that,
it's based on the behaviors
that we have recorded, okay...
is that I actually think that there are
multiple groups and there's more than one.
And from the information
that we are getting,
there's at least reason to
think that one of those groups
does not have our
best interests at heart
and may actually
be hostile to us.
And you... I've heard this
again and again and again.
And indeed, when you
look at the long history
of military engagements
with these things,
they're not usually
initiating overt hostilities,
although there have been pilot
deaths in connection with UFOs.
And some of the engagements do
actually seem like they're being hostile.
But generally, uh, they're just being
provocative in one way or another.
So, at the at the least, you can
say there's some kind of trouble
out there in paradise, between
us and at least one group of them.
And if you're a military
person, you know,
look, your job in the military
is to defend your nation.
That's your job.
And if you've got even a potential
threat in these other things,
you have to, by your duty,
you have to recognize
that threat, and you have to
at least have a plan
for dealing with it.
That's just the reality.
So does that mean they're
gonna go false-flagging us?
Or they're gonna be
legit? Look, I don't know.
I don't have every
answer here, either.
But, uh, it's not illegitimate.
At least, you know our
priority is, on the face of it,
it's not illegitimate to at least
explore the possibility of threat.
That's my position.
What attracted you to physics?
I started teaching, taught physics and
astronomy here at Nebraska, Omaha,
for 34 years,
And during that time, I
also taught for 17 summers,
and for a number of
times during the year
at Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory in Livermore, California,
I had a security clearance, and I
studied the effects of nuclear weapons.
I studied electromagnetic
theory, and nuclear theory,
a bunch of different things
and atmospheric physics.
And I did that for 17 summers.
That was a big
part of my research.
I also got a grant
to work for NASA.
STS-48, September 13, 1991.
It appears there is something
coming from the Earth's surface
in response to an object
entering the atmosphere.
Soon after this footage
was shot, Dr. Kasher wrote
a full scientific
analysis of the events.
He submitted his findings
to NASA and the public.
I don't know what this thing is,
but it's really a very
interesting object too.
Depending on how far away
from the shuttle they were
was an extraordinary thing.
To the extent that if they were
ten miles or farther from the shuttle,
they behaved in ways
that were vastly beyond
anything that we
can do on the Earth.
Four NASA employees were
given this to offer their opinion.
They just watched the video.
They did no analysis of it,
and what they came up with was reasonable,
that it had to be ice particles,
and that's as far
as they took it.
They did not say a single thing
about, there were two streaks
that went up through there, like
you might expect from a missile.
I was able to rule out at least
five times, five different proofs
that they were
not ice particles.
And if they weren't, the
only other viable option
is some kind of spacecraft.
And the way it behaved...
Again, I can't prove how far
away it was from the shuttle.
If it is a mile away,
that's unbelievably close.
It's dangerous.
If it's ten miles away, it
accelerated in a fashion
that was beyond anything that
humans could stand, 100Gs it would be,
which would, you know,
destroy a human being,
And then, if you start
going out beyond ten miles.
Then we're talking about quantum
leaps in technology beyond what we have.
And so, to me, the
logical conclusion is
that these were spacecraft
from somewhere else out in space
away from the shuttle.
And it's hard to explain those
two streaks that went through there,
unless it is in terms of...
One good explanation might
be that they were missiles,
that we might be firing at them.
And that's a scary thing too.
Dr. Jack Kasher is
another perfect example
of a NASA employee
blowing the whistle on UFOs.
As we continue into
modern space exploration,
NASA became more
sophisticated in their approach
at hiding what they were
recording, above and beyond.